> It's different in many respects. In my opinion, one respect in which > it does not differ is that it's inappropriate material for bugtraq, or > more precisely that I have not yet seen anything that makes me think it > is appropriate. Your first sentence, above, reads "produced ... > material critical of AARNet security action would be taken ...", but it > doesn't indicate whether the comma would go after "AARNet" or after > "security". If the latter, there may well be some > appropriate-for-bugtraq information involved - though even then, not > unless software bugs were involved, I would say. > It should have been "AARNet security, action". ie the paper I am writing shows holes in AARNet security which allows serious fraud. Proff